| The wisdom of polarized crowds F Shi, M Teplitskiy, E Duede, JA Evans Nature human behaviour 3 (4), 329-336, 2019 | 197 | 2019 |
| Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science M Teplitskiy, G Lu, E Duede Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016 | 169 | 2016 |
| The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review M Teplitskiy, D Acuna, A Elamrani-Raoult, K Körding, J Evans Research Policy 47 (9), 1825-1841, 2018 | 109 | 2018 |
| How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited M Teplitskiy, E Duede, M Menietti, KR Lakhani Research Policy 51 (4), 104484, 2022 | 86* | 2022 |
| Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation JN Lanei, M Teplitskiy, G Gray, H Ranu, M Menietti, E Guinan, KR Lakhani Management Science, 2021 | 77* | 2021 |
| Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference M Sun, J Barry Danfa, M Teplitskiy Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73 (6 …, 2022 | 38 | 2022 |
| Frame search and re-search: How quantitative sociological articles change during peer review M Teplitskiy The American Sociologist 47 (2), 264-288, 2016 | 32 | 2016 |
| Consensus, Polarization, and Alignment in the Economics Profession TS Van Gunten, JL Martin, M Teplitskiy Sociological Science, 2016 | 29 | 2016 |
| Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals M Teplitskiy, H Peng, A Blasco, KR Lakhani Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (47), e2118046119, 2022 | 27 | 2022 |
| Author mentions in science news reveal widespread disparities across name-inferred ethnicities H Peng, M Teplitskiy, D Jurgens Quantitative Science Studies 5 (2), 351-365, 2024 | 11* | 2024 |
| Do Peer Reviews Predict Impact? Evidence from the American Sociological Review, 1978 to 1982 M Teplitskiy, V Bakanic Socius 2, 2378023116640278, 2016 | 10 | 2016 |
| Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance E Duede, M Teplitskiy, K Lakhani, J Evans Research Policy 53 (2), 104911, 2024 | 9 | 2024 |
| The Gender Gap in Scholarly Self-Promotion on Social Media H Peng, M Teplitskiy, DM Romero, EÁ Horvát arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05330, 2022 | 8 | 2022 |
| Acceptance in Top Journals Shows Large Disparities across Name-inferred Ethnicities H Peng, K Lakhani, M Teplitskiy SocArXiv, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
| The effect of conference presentations on the diffusion of ideas M Teplitskiy, S Park, N Thompson, D Karger arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01175, 2022 | 3 | 2022 |
| Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited H Bao, M Sun, M Teplitskiy arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11583, 2024 | 2 | 2024 |
| A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science H Bao, M Teplitskiy Nature Communications 15 (1), 431, 2024 | 2* | 2024 |
| The bias-reducing effect of voluntary anonymization of authors’ identities: Evidence from peer review I Smirnova, DM Romero, M Teplitskiy Available at SSRN 4190623, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |
| Author-suggested reviewers rate manuscripts much more favorably: A cross-sectional analysis of the neuroscience section of PLOS ONE DE Acuna, M Teplitskiy, JA Evans, K Kording PLOS ONE 17 (12), e0273994, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| Lack of peer reviewer diversity advantages authors from wealthier countries JMZ Dumlao, M Teplitskiy OSF, 2023 | 1 | 2023 |
