Follow
Ewald Enzinger
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Score based procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios–scores should take account of both similarity and typicality
GS Morrison, E Enzinger
Science & Justice 58 (1), 47-58, 2018
572018
Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison
GS Morrison, E Enzinger, V Hughes, M Jessen, D Meuwly, C Neumann, ...
Science & Justice 61 (3), 299-309, 2021
522021
A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case
E Enzinger, GS Morrison, F Ochoa
Science & Justice 56 (1), 42-57, 2016
522016
What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
GS Morrison, E Enzinger
Science & Justice 56 (5), 374-379, 2016
482016
Effects of telephone transmission on the performance of formant-trajectory-based forensic voice comparison–female voices
C Zhang, GS Morrison, E Enzinger, F Ochoa
Speech Communication 55 (6), 796-813, 2013
482013
Forensic database of voice recordings of 500+ Australian English speakers
GS Morrison, C Zhang, E Enzinger, F Ochoa, D Bleach, M Johnson, ...
432015
Multi-laboratory evaluation of forensic voice comparison systems under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic case (forensic_eval_01)–Introduction
GS Morrison, E Enzinger
speech communication 85, 119-126, 2016
382016
Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case
E Enzinger, GS Morrison
Forensic Science International 277, 30-40, 2017
302017
The importance of using between-session test data in evaluating the performance of forensic-voice-comparison systems
E Enzinger, GS Morrison
Proceedings of the 14th Australasian International Conference on Speech …, 2012
292012
Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison
C Zhang, GS Morrison, F Ochoa, E Enzinger
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (1), EL54-EL60, 2013
282013
Statistical models in forensic voice comparison
SM Geoffrey, E Ewald, D Ramos, J González-Rodríguez, A Lozano-Díez
Handbook of forensic statistics, 451-497, 2020
272020
Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison–A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when …
GS Morrison, E Enzinger, C Zhang
Science & Justice 56 (6), 492-497, 2016
232016
Characterizing formant tracks in Viennese diphthongs for forensic speaker comparison
E Enzinger
Audio Engineering Society Conference: 39th International Conference: Audio …, 2010
232010
Introduction to forensic voice comparison
GS Morrison, E Enzinger
The Routledge handbook of phonetics, 599-634, 2019
212019
Voice source features for forensic voice comparison – an evaluation of the GLOTTEX software package
E Enzinger, C Zhang, GS Morrison
Odyssey 2012: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 25-28, 2012
202012
Multi-laboratory evaluation of forensic voice comparison systems under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic case (forensic_eval_01)–Conclusion
GS Morrison, E Enzinger
Speech Communication 112, 37-39, 2019
162019
Mismatched distances from speakers to telephone in a forensic-voice-comparison case
E Enzinger, GS Morrison
Speech Communication 70, 28--41, 2015
142015
Validations of an alpha version of the E3 Forensic Speech Science System (E3FS3) core software tools
P Weber, E Enzinger, B Labrador, A Lozano-Díez, D Ramos, ...
Forensic Science International: Synergy 4, 100223, 2022
122022
Implementation of forensic voice comparison within the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence
E Enzinger
UNSW Sydney, 2015
112015
Fusion of multiple formant-trajectory-and fundamental-frequency-based forensic-voice-comparison systems: Chinese/ei1/, /ai2/, and /iau1/
C Zhang, E Enzinger
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19 (1), 060044, 2013
92013
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20